No, Not Everyone Does It, Lady

There are two factions of those "attitudes" that, though they may seem to be in opposition, actually assist down the same path. It really does not matter whether we're talking about porn, gays, abortion, or whatever flavor this month's menu of crap to be shoved down our throats. Supporters on both sides always try to make us believe they are talking about a large portion of the population or a "majority". This is a vain attempt to force others to just accept this as "reality", when the real world data does not come close. At the same time, those who appear to oppose such agendas, lifestyles, etc, tend to remain silent. Maybe you'll hear a peep here and there, but not really with the gusto that the supporters generate. Around the country there appears to be a trend signifying that this silence of the opposition is ending in certain venues. Still, Ohio remains relatively stagnant on too many topics. Recall the recent vote on amending our constitution to make murdering an unborn child a "right"? Shamefully, it passed, but that was mostly due to the low turnout of those who claimed to be opposed. It seems like even the constitutionalized murder of children won't wake the silent opposition in Ohio. Utterly shameful.

The larger point is that when a person makes the statement, "Everyone does it." and it is presented as "fact", first and foremost, displays the utter stupidity of that person. Secondly, if the person that made the statement is vying for support of their stand on any given issue--especially one as tedious as the topic of porn--wouldn't you want to stick to the actual point? Instead, you wrap everyone into one group in a vain attempt to make yourself feel better about your own immoral activity. That is exactly one of the most popular tactics of crap-pushers, but I covered that in the previous paragraph. So let's move on to the actual point. Mallory McMaster was interviewed by News Cleveland 5 in the clip, "Pornsub" from last night. She sheepishly made the statement: "Everyone does it. It's just a fact of life." She uses that baseless claim to support her position against the Ohio Bill HB295, "Innocence Act." Seriously, lady? That's all you got? She goes on to say that no one  wants to have a log of the porn they view, that "it could be used to blackmail...." Now, that is a statement that could be factually grouped into the "everyone" bucket. No one wants to be monitored, tracked, or have their privacy invaded by our ever-so-far-reaching government. 

If the so-called "Left", or anyone for that matter, truly wants their point to be heard and win their arguments, then stick to the point of the actual issue. Rather than lump "everyone" into your immoral activities and speak as if it is fact, look beyond what "the other side" proposes and find the actual agenda. Do some verified research before you open your mouth on live tv. And I mean real research, not the bullshit that is made up and paid for by big names and companies. Rather than your side rallying bored, mad youth to cause chaos and burn cities, why don't you speak on THE issue with respect and tenacity? Otherwise you're just turning away many who might agree with your stance. Truth be told, as much as I abhor Mallory's reasons, I must say that I agree that HB295 ought to be tossed into the trash.

My mother used to tell me, "If everyone is jumping off a cliff, are you going to jump, too?" Her intent was to clarify in my childhood mind that just because it seems like "everyone" is doing it, the it may not make sense or be safe to do. My mother, whether she was aware or not, helped me learn to reason for myself. Nowadays is not a whole lot different than when I grew up in the eighties. The "peer pressure" to go along with the crowd was just as bad back then as it is now. The only difference, really, is today with the internet and all these cell phone cameras, social media and whatnot, a person cannot even pick her nose and keep it private, let alone oppose the imaginary "crowd". So, I want to take a moment here to let anyone else know that it is just fine--even admirable--to think for yourself. And, back to our topic, even if many around you adamantly indulge in the immoral activities of watching others f*ck, you do not have to be one of them. And please, for God's sake, do not remain silent!

So, Mrs. McMaster was interviewed for this segment and presented as "a Clevelander opposed to porn age verification", or HB295. Nowhere is it mentioned that she is actually a "reproductive right activist" and owns the Fairmount Group, based in Chardon, Ohio. This ought to be pertinent to the (actual) topic, but not even the banner at the bottom of the screen mentioned that she is a "social justice" and "feminist" warrior. Why not? Is it part of the deceptive practices we see are so commonplace in MSM nowadays? She is presented as a mere concerned citizen and talks briefly about how HB295 would affect her privacy. I have no factual idea as to why they hid that part of her identity. I simply am noting that it follows the deceptive patterns of MSM. What I find more interesting here is the fact that the MSM does what it is paid to do: Push the overall agenda. They don't give a damn about McMaster's or anyone's privacy. So, here is this beautiful, ambitious mother and business owner taking the time to speak on an issue, not realizing (I assume) the real agenda here. Now, let us get to the actual topic.

As a side note, first. The Mallory McMaster in the News 5 interview appears to be the same person of the Fairmount Group. I have had no contact with either of them, so check it out for yourself. If I'm wrong, sorry ;) 

Lt. Governor of Ohio, Jon Husted, at a press conference on the so-called "Innocence Act" (HB295) appeared emphatic when he spoke on the fines and charges that would be levied against porn sites that did not verify IDs of its users. He made the comment, "...where you're basically trying to sell porn to kids." Gosh. Does he really think we're all that stupid? Granted, most businesses that would disseminate such garbage likely do not give a damn if it's reaching children. But for the Lt. Gov to make such a statement airs his own brand of stupidity, that he would have us believe such purveyors of filth are "trying to sell porn to kids." Yet another peer pressure tactic to hide the real agenda: Using a baseless accusation intended to incite people to side with him. This bill has not a thing to do with caring about or trying to protect kids. It is a hot-button topic that most folks do not want to talk about that is being used to further erode our rights. That's all. Much like the mask mandates of 2020 + and all the tape lines and arrows on the floors of most businesses were not at all about our health or any concern for the well-being of humanity. Rather, it was all about social control. Now that they have at least a few years of sheeple compliance, they're moving on to set the groundwork for the next big thing. Eventually, "they" (whoever you chose to believe is in control) intend to implement a digital ID that stores all information about you and is used to access everything. Including, if not staring with, the internet. That is what this bill is truly about, which is why I must say I agree with Mallory McMaster at least in the fact that HB295 must not pass.

Also, I must agree with the statement McMaster made, "It's a fact of life." Now, the "it" she meant was that "everyone does it", which is a lie. But I do agree that the actual fact of life is all sorts of immorality is legal because the reprobate human desire for such is strong. Way too many of the bills, laws and movements out there skate around the real issues while giving the appears of noble causes. Mr. Husted, and those in support of this bill, shame on you. All of you (ironically, all but one of the sponsors are "Republican"...freakin RINOS). If you gave a damn about helping parents keep our kids safe and "innocent" (since the bill is deceptively titled such), how about getting to the bottom of the REAL issues? Instead of throwing up a smokescreen bill to deceive the unaware masses of Ohio into a near future demise, what about cracking down on child services agencies? Do you even pay attention to the fact that most of Ohio's 88 county agencies FAIL their periodic reviews? Still, you pour insane amounts of money (our tax dollars) into that legalized child trafficking network, we all know as child so-called "protective" services. At the same time, for decades, regardless of who is in office, y'all ignore the repeated complaints against those agencies. Social workers lie, fabricate and do all sorts of illegal acts to make their cases, yet after over 20 years (at least) none of you even broach the topic. As a result, far too often kids raised in the "care" of the state end up worse off than kids raised by their natural parents. And you claim to care about our kids.

...and that is just ONE example of the actual issues you law makers ought to be addressing. 

Instead, you're on the national, even global, bandwagon to further erode our rights. Again, shame on you people. You, Husted, note that it is illegal to market adult products to kids. No shit, Dick Tracey. So, why not write a bill that is aimed at marketing and the marketers? Why not find a way to charge and fine them? Instead you want citizens to be required to show ID and share all their personal info with strangers at 3rd party companies, in spite of how risky that is nowadays? Do you see how you tell on yourself as to the real agenda here? News 5 claims that this, like in several other states, is an effort to try and "crack down on porn." What liars! If you want to crack down on porn, why go after the user end? Some advice, Mr. Husted, et al? Leave the task of restricting children up to the parents and let's have an honest chat about the real issues.

Now, I am not here claiming I have all the answers, but am certain your proposed bill (HB295) is not even a good start. So, let's have a chat about the real issues. What about the fact that when child services does (factually) verify that a parent molested a child, that parent is almost never (less than 1%) charged by the prosecutor. Among many other malfeasance there, what message do you think that child victim receives? Gosh. I wonder how many of those children end up porn "stars"? On top of that, thanx to pervert politics being worked out in "family" court, most children who tell on an abusive parent is taken from the protective parent and handed over to the abuser, on whom he just told. Figure that one out, right? I'll give you a hint. That system has more to do with what makes the agencies and state the most money and not a damn thing to do with "the best interests of the child." Ask our State Senator, Kristina Roegner. In my twenty-five years of exposing this garbage she is the first (and only) to actually try to bring these malfeasance to the Floor years ago. Obviously, she did not gain much support from any of the rest of you. So, again, Husted, you truly want to do something to help parents protect our children from smut brokers, et al? Let's have a raw, honest chat. After you toss HB295, that is.

The real issues about porn specifically cannot be legislated away until the culture itself begins to have honest, frank discussions about the raw truth of the matters. That raw truth is, first and foremost, all of the actors you see in porn clips and movies are someone's child. The fact that the actors are adults (barely) does not change that. Our peer pressure culture of "everyone does it" so it must be acceptable has perverted public senses. I recall when my oldest daughter was just a wee gal, standing in the grocery store checkout line with me, overwhelmed at all the borderline risque' photos of barely clad women plastered with pancake batter make up. Those magazines were right at eye level for a child. Why? In this country we have the right to view smut. Fine. But it does not have to be in the faces of children at the grocery store. From then on, my little girl was stricken with all the worldly ideals of what women ought to look like, act like, and what was expected of them. Nowadays, we have women running around, publicly displaying every damned dimple in their asses with painted on "yoga pants" and their boobs bubbling up from their skimpy, tight shirts, squeezed like a volcanic eruption. When I was a young teen my grandmother told me, "Don't put your best merchandise in the front window." Even though it took me a few more years to figure out what she meant by "merchandise", it doesn't seem like that sort of wisdom is passed on anymore. The point here is, if anyone truly desires to make laws restricting immoral things, such as porn, address those pushing it. In fact, start by repenting of your own immorality and have the resolve to relentlessly pursue changing our cultural "ideals". The rest of you, STOP pushing the lie that "everyone does it." To those who don't do it, speak up! Let's begin to show pride in piety. You don't have to be religious to be pious. Just display some class.

With each step to be more and more revealing, sexual and even grotesque, we hear the insanity "everyone does it." Even when not directly spoken, it is inferred almost everywhere we look. How does anyone in their right mind assume that will not effect children? Especially when those who are not "doing it" and do not agree with it say little to nothing? Saying nothing in the face of growing immorality is, in essence, walking in agreement with that immorality. Sure, this is America where you have the right to be immoral to various extents. I'll concede to that. But privately. You have that right in your private life. You have an obligation to assert at least a little class when in public. If you do actually care about kids, that is.

Obviously, this topic got me worked up a bit. The reasons I am so passionate about this topic are layered and I think I addressed those clearly, for the most part, above. The last layer, of sorts, that needs to be addressed is the lackadaisical attitudes toward one of the most lucrative industries in the world: The creation and dissemination of smut. How anyone can write that off as "a fact of life" is absurd to me. Especially when most people claiming such are just either too "scared" (embarrassed, etc) to talk about it, or present themselves as "feminists". How can any clear minded person not see that the porn industry is simply a legalized form of trafficking and prostitution? And it's all supported and supplied by the perpetual grooming of our children in almost every facet of society--those that that support it and those that say they oppose it. Those that support it claim that the ladies, in particular, in the industry make a "choice" to do what they do and say nothing of all the borderline smut almost everywhere we turn in public (grocery store mags, people barely wearing clothes in public, tv show soft porn, etc). Those that claim to oppose it say little or nothing, and do less to stop it. Thus, our kids are groomed almost daily and any voice that does speak out against it is met with the blow off excuse, "Everyone does it." Thus, no real conversation ensues. Girls are groomed to believe that their worth is how hot they can get a guy aroused and how good they are sexually, how far they'll go, etc. Boys are groomed to believe that they're more and more a "stud" with every sexual conquest. (There is more to this, but I'm trying to be concise.) Having no comrades in this fight against societal grooming, a decent parent trying to instill some class into his or her child (boy or girl) is set as the weirdo. The oppressor trying to make her child an outcast.  

Well, I do not mind at all being the weirdo or outcast. Ever since I can recall, even way back to childhood, it never bothered me to be different. Especially when what I saw "everyone" doing made no sense to me. What makes absolutely no sense to me now is the idea that most accept that those young girls make an informed decision to have wild sexual encounters with multiple partners, often strangers, all day, almost every day, while more strangers film it. I find it ludicrous that so many people believe that those girls are fully alright with companies making millions to billions each year, off their backs. Literally. Oh, but it's so much easier for you anonymous viewers of smut to believe such lies. After all, the girls in your favorite videos believe the lies. Why not enjoy their pain? Shame on you.

The truth of the porn industry is that it is about the same as the, what we normally perceive of, sex trafficking industry. And yes. I did my research. Though largely informal, I can say this with absolute certainty. Check out the many who have come out of the industry and speak out against it. I also listened to girls when they were still actively involved in playing such roles. Even those that claim "choice" excuses, it is apparent they have little to no respect for themselves. If they did, why do they self-medicate to cope with their "choice" of profession? Yes. Most of those girls and guys are on something--illicit or prescribed--most of the time. It was also apparent that they were not fully informed upfront of what they were getting into, rather were lured by vain and vague promises at each stage. The way the industry itself is set up is a combination of a violent street gang and the dark behind the scenes side of Hollywood. To break in, you must prove yourself. That usually means pushing the limits to the scariest, often quite painful, perverse "pleasures" of sex. Next, the new "starlet", as they call them, is set up with an agent, who is more like a glorified pimp. The agent sets the schedules and will pressure girls into roles, while "managing" every dollar the girls earn, only affording the girls a meager allowance. When their contracts are up, if they ever are, the girls are doled out a portion. But nothing in comparison to what she gave up to make millions for the agency--not to mention the multi-billion enrichment of the industry. She could even be greatly penalized if she tries to get out of the contract early.

Wait a minute... I thought the great ole US of A abolished slavery long ago?

One of the elements used in my research was the documentary Aroused. A 2012 film (released in 2013) by Deborah Anderson that got up close and and deeply personal with "16 of the most successful women in the adult film industry." In spite of my view of the sex trade, I watched it for two reasons. One, because I care. I care to learn as much as I can about the young girls that are swooned away into such dark places. Learning about them helps me to better help them, as well as help others understand how abhorrent the industry is. The other reason I watched the documentary is due to the fact that my own daughter is one of those sixteen most successful women. Ironic, eh? In fact, she was the one that told me about the film before its release. For anyone who, like me, is curious about the people and do not want to view the porn, the film is tastefully done, for the most part. I would venture to say, a work of art. Where Anderson ruins it is toward the end, just as the credits begin to roll, she inserted clips from the girls' various movies. So, just a word of caution there, in case you chose to watch. I did shut it off at that point, but like I said, the film overall was interesting and well made. It gets right up in the faces of the girls with all sorts of questions as they prepare for and participate in an artistic photo shoot, wearing nothing but extremely high end shoes. Anderson also interviews a lady who managed the girls for one of the largest agencies in the nation. Based in Los Angeles, CA, LA Direct enslaves hundreds--maybe even thousands--of young women each year. Fran Amidor, the accountant managing the girls, made some very frank statements during the interview for Aroused. The most profound statement, in my opinion, ought to clear away any doubt of those who try to rationalize viewing smut. Amidor point blank states to Anderson, "It [being a porn actress] steals their souls." She is quoted in other places, stating that she would not want her child in the industry because, "it f*cks with their heads and I don't want to be the mother of a whore." 

Think of that for a moment, at least. This person that is paid big bucks in a big industry for the largest agency in the nation and who claims to be the one to listen to, counsel and care for the girls. This person whose livelihood depends on these girls, refers to them as whores. The beautiful, often very young, ladies you fantasize about are deemed whores by their own agents and people they confide in. Even you who partake in viewing deem the girls unworthy. Trash. If that was not true, why stay anonymous? I have never heard of anyone rave on and on about how much they admire a porn actress. So, not only are little girls battered and groomed by societal attitudes throughout their childhood, when they become convinced of the lies (that's all they're good for) and "choose" that work, not even the people they work to please (the industry and the consumers) value them for anything more than a commodity. A way to make money or get off. Our society tells little girls constantly what it means to be pretty. Be sexual, after all, "everyone does it." In other words, the culture of our society trains and convinces little girls to become whores and when they do they are treated as trash. Granted, there are other factors in this equation, but the base is still 2+2 always equals 4. Figuring out the process is not rocket science. All the girls that "choose" this industry may be from a wide variety of backgrounds, life experiences, etc. But the only common denominator is the culture of our society in which they were raised. 

Either way, whatever side of the porn issue you stand on, I hope we can all agree that HB295 "The Innocence Act" needs to be stopped. Call or send your state senator and representative an email insisting they stop passing deceptive garbage bills that seek only to erode the rights of Ohio citizens. 

...and if anyone wants to have that chat on the real issues, give a holler at lynnette@unkpi.net. 

"But by the grace of God I am what I am, and His grace toward me was not in vain." I Corinthians 15:10a

You can edit text on your website by double clicking on a text box on your website. Alternatively, when you select a text box a settings menu will appear. your website by double clicking on a text box on your website. Alternatively, when you select a text box